On the Burden (or Onus) of Proof

ETA: see below.

Some interesting thoughts on the so-called "onus [or burden] of proof" are out on the web right now, and I wanted to make a few comments, if I may:

I agree the "burden of proof" concept is maybe overstated in humanistic disciplines like religious studies.  I'd also agree that in areas without a consensus position, the burden is indeed simply on the person trying to make one case or another.  Having said that, I think there are meaningful ways in which a "burden of proof" can be employed.